Lee Hogan This will be an exciting duel between two remarkable smartphones of special backgrounds. Presenting to you the Lumia 800 – the agency’s first Windows Phone cellphone and the pride and pleasure of Nokia. This flagship is based heavily on Nokia’s famed constructed quality, an amazing OS from Microsoft, and some Carl Zeiss magic to take a big bite out of the contemporary market. The competitor we’ve got thrown into the arena is a worthy adversary – Motorola RAZR XT910 comes up with a thin, ultra-cool layout and its twin-center strength to reveal why Android is primary. Let’s not waste any more time and leap instantly to business.
The first spherical refers back to the form and constructed elements, and we can inform you without delay that it will be tough to discover a winner. Here are the measurements: Nokia Lumia 800 – 116.5 x sixty-one. 2 x 12.1 mm, 142 g—Motorola RAZR—130.7 x sixty-eight.9 x 7.1 mm, 127 g. Both producers recognize how to prepare a long-lasting and smooth attention tool, and it’s the same with the two handsets in the query.
The Lumia 800 offers stability and comfort when maintained on your hand while having a super-searching polycarbonate chassis, which protects in case the smartphone is dropped. The Moto RAZR is equally long as long-listings, with almost the idea of a typical top-rate top-rate as Nokia’s flagship. The one thing that makes it distinctive is the 7.1mm thick frame that could either be appears or a drawback, depending on the depending chaser’s desire. Both handsets feature Gorilla Glass, meaning there is no risk of harm from your keys, cash, or sharp gadgets you deliver to your pocket. As noted, it is intricate and spherical, and we cannot claim anything besides a drawing.
Display: our 2d round makes a specialty of what these two smartphones need to provide in terms of their screen generation. The one at the RAZR is truly superb – a 4. The three-inch Super AMOLED Plus display screen runs at a resolution of 540 x 960 while offering a pixel density of 256PPI. On the other hand, the Lumia 800 is attempting to hold up, using a three.7-inch AMOLED screen, runs at 480 x 800 and boasts a pixel density 252PPI. We love the AMOLED displays on each of them; the strong demand is low, the colors are vibrant, and the whole lot looks awesome. However, the Super AMOLED screen on Motorola’s RAZR proved brighter, demanding less strength and imparting higher sunlight legibility, supporting the Android handset to win this spherical.
Power – even though the Nokia Lumia 800 is predicated on a single middle CPU, particularly the Scorpion 1.4GHz, it is truly a Marisagon chipset. It also has an incredible performance, the Adreno 205 GPU, so you can be available while simultaneously undergoing many tasks. On the disadvantage, the WP tool handles 512MB of RAM, which is not even the first rate. The RAZR XT910 hhas a 1.2GHz twin-center Cortex-A9 CPU, which is way better than the one at the Lumia. Furthermore, it additionally has PowerVR SGX540 snapshots and 1GB of RAM, making it very clean for us to pick. This round goes to the RAZR.
The digital camera branch needs to honestly be an area wherein the Lumia 800 can feel like home. That’s due to Nokia’s longtime relationship with Carl Zeiss, which is also the gift for Lumia’s eight-megapixel camera, which includes vehicle awareness, dual-LED flash, 720p film seize, and geo-tagging. We admit that it can take a few super photos. However, it also has a few flaws that the RAZR would not have. For instance, it can as slow to focus, and falls flat while trying to snap impromptu shots. The digital camera at the RAZR is yet another 8MP; however, it provides a greater strong overall performance. It functions with LED flash, contact recognition, face detection, geo-tagging, photograph stabilization, and 1080P video capture. Moto’s handset also offers a 1.3MP front dealing with a digicam, permitting you to video chat on the cross and making the handset a clear winner of yet another round.
The software program part is honestly hard to research, however, we are going to do our best. As you know, the Lumia 800 runs on the modern Winmodern-day 7.5 platform, which proves to be a rather desirable OS. It is not the most effective, but does it have a solid foundation? However, it also gives sweets, including multitasking, Internet Explorer Nine, a commonplace inbox that collectively brings all your electronic mail money owed, threaded message aid, and many others. What about apps, you ask?!
Do not fea to access the Windows Phone Marketplace and get all the apps you may want. Android 2. Three Gingerbread is the OS that makes the Motorola RAZR run so smoothly. It functions with dozens of elements, making this Android modso popular and allowing the consumer much room for customization and development. The Android Market is where you may find loads of favored apps. Alongside this satisfactory Android foundation, Motorola brings some unique customization to the table, which is likewise also. Deciding which OS is higher genuinely represents an impossible mission because it’s hard to establish a prevalent pattern that pleases users. The right news is that each device is fast and easy to apply, so no one needs to mind if we call this a draw.
To start out our conclusion, we have to say what an amazing cellphone the Lumia 800 is. It, in reality, suggests that Nokia is shifting within the right route, and we can only hope their handsets will increase. However, the Motorola RAZR XT910 received more rounds and represented a wiser preference on the complete. It’s narrow and light and reaches rapid speeds thanks to its dual-middle engine. It does not depend on what handset you select; rest confident that you have a good preference because each gadget is one of the qualities available on the market.