Lee Hogan We’ve been dying to make a comparison between the Lumia 800 and an Android handset, and the instant isn’t close to it; it’s here! Nokia’s first Windows Phone tool has been inside the highlight because of its inception, receiving pretty good feedback, and we determined to put it to the test alongside the most important Android phone in the marketplace – the Samsung Galaxy Note. Which one will be triumphant? Here it goes.
Without a doubt, the software program department is what, in all likelihood, pastimes the most of you, and it will constitute our first round for tonight. Nokia joined forces with Microsoft in advance this 12 months, in a particularly desperate try to offer its handsets a working machine that can effectively compare itself with Google’s Android or the iOS from Apple. Did it succeed? Well, we assume so. The new flagship handset targeted to be the principal representative of this Nokia/Microsoft joint is the Lumia 800, which runs on Windows Phone 7. Five Mango and has a few surely terrific performances. Choosing this cellphone will provide you with plenty of enhancements over the launch version of WP Mango, which incorporates assistance for multitasking, social networking, Internet Explorer 9, and so forth. Microsoft even made a formidable flow, enabling Android or iOS customers to test out the WP Mango on their handsets. That shows acceptance as true with and agree with manner electricity. On the alternative hand, Samsung Galaxy Note runs Android 2. Three Gingerbread, which is a true delight to use. You have more apps than you can probably want through the Android Market and loads of customization capability even as the platform assures a safe and speedy enjoy. The running systems are exclusive, but they may be each exceptional. The WP Mango deserves credit for sticking up to the Android OS, and this primary round results in a draw.
Form & Build is our second spherical of the conflict. Samsung maintained its belief in ”plastic uber allies” and used the same approach to construct the Galaxy Note. However, what came out is a fairly mild and skinny device, which doesn’t give the influence that it needs to price lots of money. The well-known feel and aesthetic aren’t remarkable; however, the Gorilla Glass coating on the show and universal consolation that the tool gives the form of makes up for it. The Lumia 800, however, feels terrific in hand and represents one of the classiest smartphones available on the market. It has a polycarbonate chassis that feels sturdy and looks high-quality, even retaining a skinny body. The Lumia 800 surely wins this one.
Display – Nokia selected to destroy the Lumia 800 with a 3.7 inch AMOLED display which operates at a resolution of 480 x 800 at the same time as having a pixel density of 252PPI (pixels per inch). The AMOLED show proves to be a superb choice for the Lumia 800, living up to the Lumia name with a splendidly vibrant and vivid display screen. The Galaxy Note additionally features AMOLED generation, but with a slight distinction. AMOLED is Samsung’s infant, for that reason allowing their cellphone to get hold of a Super AMOLED display, operating at 800 x 1280 whilst offering a pixel density of 285PPI and measuring a tablet-sized five. Three inches. Both AMOLED’s are viable opponents of Apple’s Retina Display, playing pretty a whole lot the identical stage of responsiveness and low energy needs. Although the Nokia Lumia 800 blessings from a first-rate cell show, this spherical, honestly, will be the Samsung Galaxy Note.
Processor and Memory – The Lumia 800 runs on a single-core 1.4GHz CPU, features an Adreno 205 GPU and has 512MB of RAM. Apps, games, lots of duties are chewed with no problem by using this combination of power, but all over again, the Galaxy Note comes higher geared up. It sports a 1.4Ghz dual-center ARM Cortex-A9 processor, Mali-400MP GPU, and 1GB RAM, supplying you with blistering speeds to perform any preferred action. It also has an extra garage area, with sixteen or 32GB which can be pre-hooked up, and a microSD card helping up to any other 32GB. Meanwhile, Nokia’s handset can only offer 16GB of the inner room without a microSD assist. Winner – Galaxy Note.
The digicam round proves to be a problematic one, seeing that both handsets have snappers properly. Everyone is aware that Nokia’s courting with Carl Zeiss produced some terrific digicam phones over the years, and the only at the Lumia 800 isn’t an exception. Its 8MP camera advantages from dual-LED flash, autofocus, geo-tagging, and 720p movie capture. It offers an excellent experience; however, it kinda’ leaves us wanting for more. It has some minor smooth spots, particularly it struggles to attention and someday seems worked to begin from cold; however, these items might be ironed out with a software update. The Galaxy Note functions as an 8MP camera properly, which comes with autofocus, LED flash, photograph stabilization, geo-tagging, touch focus, face & smile detection, and 1080p video capture capability. This camera continues the same old set by way of the only on the Galaxy S II, that’s quite exceptional. The component that enables the Note to win this spherical is its front-facing 2MP digicam, allowing you to have all of the video meetings and humorous self-portraits you might need. Galaxy Note wins this one as well.
Final thoughts – Nokia’s flagship positioned up quite a fight nowadays; however, because the rounds came to an give up, the best call prevailed: Samsung Galaxy Note. It has brilliant energy, a satisfying screen, and lots of other incredible features. The Lumia 800 is surely a massive step forward for the Finnish organization. Their tool has a fantastic design, a few virtually nice specs, and a fantastic operating machine. It proved to be a worthy adversary to any Android handset, which is itself a performance.